The folklore problem
Best practices nobody has tested. Attribution models mistaken for ground truth. Dashboards that measure activity instead of effect. Claims pass between agencies and conference stages until repetition makes them feel true.
media science a working notebook
Digital marketing produces enormous amounts of data and surprisingly little evidence. I’m Rob - I work in digital media, and this notebook is where the industry’s received wisdom gets tested against what the numbers actually show.
Written and edited by a person. Nothing publishes without sign-off - here’s exactly how AI helps.
entry 00 why this exists
Best practices nobody has tested. Attribution models mistaken for ground truth. Dashboards that measure activity instead of effect. Claims pass between agencies and conference stages until repetition makes them feel true.
Treat every campaign, tag and ranking theory as a hypothesis. Instrument it properly, test it where you can, and be honest about uncertainty where you can’t. Some cherished tactics survive that treatment. A surprising number don’t.
the beats four programmes, one discipline
protocol applied to every post
“When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; when you cannot measure it … your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind.”
William Thomson, Lord Kelvin - Popular Lectures and Addresses, 1883
How this notebook is written
An AI research assistant watches the industry’s news feeds and drafts background briefs; a human decides what any of it means. Every post is reviewed and signed off before it publishes - the publishing system enforces it, not just policy.
The full AI use disclosurestart here the archive